Legal Opinion
Conde-Shenery v. Hazleton City
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 28, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02338Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AQUILES CONDE-SHENERY, : CIVIL NO: 3:18-CV-02338 : Plaintiff, : : v. : (Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab) : DETECTIVE DAVID RODICK, : et al., : : Defendants. : : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. The remaining claim in this case is a malicious prosecution claim by the plaintiff Aquiles Conde-Shenery. Both the defendants and Conde-Shenery have filed motions for summary judgment. Because there was probable cause for the charges against Conde-Shenery, his malicious prosecution claim fails. Thus, we will grant the defendants’…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.