Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Hollis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1933No. 12,872Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This writ of error by B. E. Woodward as receiver, and in his individual capacity, against Gordon Hollis, Harry T. Bowen and M. M. Miller is for a review of an adverse judgment of the district court striking certain matters from his complaint, and in sustaining the demurrers of the defendants to the complaint upon the ground that it failed to state a good cause of action. The objections to the trial court’s judgment are summarized at considerable length in seven different specifications. In the view we take of the case it is not necessary to consider all of these assignments. The plaintiff in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobie v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bishop v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
  3. Holcombe v. FetterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  4. Faricy v. J. S. Brown Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Roberts v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API