Legal Opinion
Retirement Bd. v. FXCM, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 17, 2019No. 18-2604-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18-2604-cv Retirement Bd. v. FXCM, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- ECA, Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Novak v. KasaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.