Legal Opinion
Jackson and Coker, Inc. v. Lynam
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-5127, 92-2311PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBRENO, District Judge.
This case involves claims of religious discrimination and retaliation by A.J. Lynam (“Lynam”) against his former employer, Jackson & Coker, Inc. (“Jackson & Coker” or “the Company”). In turn, Jackson & Coker seeks immediate repayment of a $65,-000 loan it made to Lynam to assist him with employment relocation expenses. The jury found no discrimination in employment, but determined that Jackson & Coker had retaliated against Lynam as a result of Lynam filing a claim of discrimination with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (the “PHRC”). The jury also…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Dawn L. v. Greater Johnstown School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mason v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Nissim v. McNEIL CONSUMER PRODUCTS CO., INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.