Legal Opinion
Dawn L. v. Greater Johnstown School District
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 2008No. Civil Action 3:06-19PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
The above-captioned action is brought pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a) et seq. Plaintiffs in this case are Dawn L. and Michael L. on their own behalf and on behalf of their minor daughter M.L. Defendant is the Greater Johnstown School District (hereinafter the District). Plaintiffs claim that the District, a recipient of federal funds, Vol. 5 pp. 39- 40, violated M.L.’s rights under Title IX by its unreasonable response to notice of sexual harassment…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Doe v. Salisbury UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Johnston v. University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Lansberry v. Altoona Area Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- S.K. v. North Allegheny School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Summy-Long v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.