Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Sessoms

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1995No. 946SC354Published

1Concurrence

Judge Mark D. Martin

concurring in the result only.

The present appeal arises out of the hearing conducted by the trial court on remand, pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986), to determine whether the prosecutor’s explanation for his peremptory challenge of juror Beverly Askew was race-neutral. I write separately to express my belief that the procedures used at the hearing violated defendant’s right to reciprocal fairness.

At the hearing all of defendant’s witnesses, upon taking the witness stand, were required to take an oath and were subjected to cross-examination…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Alicia Davis (85-1153), Duane Davis (85-1178), Kenneth Davis (85-1288), Howard Ransom (85-1366)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. United States v. Rondell Herbert GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API