Legal Opinion
Fink v. Chambers
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assiompsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is an action upon the following promissory note:
“ $120.00. Leroy, Oct. 8, 1888.
“ On or before the seventh day of October, 1890, I promise to pay to F. H. Leavenworth & Co., or order, one hundred twenty and no one-hundredths dollars, value received, with interest at six per cent, per annum from Oct. 7, 1889, payable at Williamston Fence Factory.
“O. Chambers.
“E. A. Leavenworth, Witness.”
Plaintiff, the indorsee of the note, is the mother of H. A. Leavenworth. II. A. is the father of E. A. Leavenworth. E. A. Leavenworth and his wife, F. H., constituted the firm of F. H. Leavenworth & Co.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sutton v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clare County Savings Bank v. FeatherlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Finance Corp. of New England, Inc. v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- A. P. Cook Co. v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Petersen v. StrawnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Carey v. NissleMichigan Supreme Court · 1906