(PC) Arrant v. Santoro
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN R. ARRANT, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13 v. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 KELLY SANTORO, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 40) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a protective order, filed September 22, 20 2021. 21 This action is proceeding Defendants Lozano, E.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000