Legal Opinion

(PC) Arrant v. Santoro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 23, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01253Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN R. ARRANT, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13 v. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 KELLY SANTORO, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 40) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a protective order, filed September 22, 20 2021. 21 This action is proceeding Defendants Lozano, E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API