Methow Forest Watch v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KING, District Judge.
Before the court are the following motions: (1) motion for summary judgment by defendant U.S. Forest Service (#43); (2) motion for summary judgment by defendant-intervenors Washington State Snowmobile Association and Winthrop Snowmobile Rental (# 42); and (3) motion for summary judgment by plaintiffs Me-thow Forest Watch, Kettle Range Conservation Group, the Lands Council, Wild Wilderness, and North Cascades Conservation Council (# 37). For the reasons below, I grant defendant and defendant-interve-nors’ motions for summary judgment and deny plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- League of Wilderness Defenders—Blue Mountain Biodiversity Project v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- LEAGUE OF WILDER. DEFENDERS-BLUE MOUN. BIODIVERSITY PROJECT v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005