Legal Opinion

Methow Forest Watch v. United States Forest Service

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 20, 2005No. 04-114-KIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KING, District Judge.

Before the court are the following motions: (1) motion for summary judgment by defendant U.S. Forest Service (#43); (2) motion for summary judgment by defendant-intervenors Washington State Snowmobile Association and Winthrop Snowmobile Rental (# 42); and (3) motion for summary judgment by plaintiffs Me-thow Forest Watch, Kettle Range Conservation Group, the Lands Council, Wild Wilderness, and North Cascades Conservation Council (# 37). For the reasons below, I grant defendant and defendant-interve-nors’ motions for summary judgment and deny plaintiffs’ motion for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. League of Wilderness Defenders—Blue Mountain Biodiversity Project v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
  2. LEAGUE OF WILDER. DEFENDERS-BLUE MOUN. BIODIVERSITY PROJECT v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API