Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Shorrock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1918No. 14337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered July 24, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to recover over from abutting owners upon liability for personal injuries sustained through a fall upon a sidewalk, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

In this action plaintiff city seeks to recover over from defendants the amount of a judgment for personal injuries caused by a fall upon a sidewalk, which judgment was recovered by one Walter L. Johnstone in an action against the city, tried by the court without a jury, and by the city paid. This action over was also tried by the court without a jury.

The trial court, after finding the corporate capacity of the city and that the defendants are husband and wife, found;

“(3) That, on the 6th day of October, 1910, lot 1, block 18, Northern addition to the city of Seattle, stood of record in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. City of Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
  5. City of St. Louis v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rivett v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bennett v. McGoldrick-sanderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gardner v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Birdsall v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. City of Cle Elum v. YeamanWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API