Legal Opinion

State v. Rath

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1980No. 42024, CA 16112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant appeals pursuant to ORS 161.327(7), 1 assigning as error that there was insufficient evidence from which the trial court could have found (1) that he presented "a substantial danger to himself or others,” and (2) was not "a proper subject for conditional release,” ORS 161.327(2), and that, therefore, defendant should not have been committed to a state mental hospital. We hold that there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to establish that defendant was dangerous either to others or to himself.

Defendant was arrested for stealing an automobile and pleaded not guilty by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of ChristoffersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. LeHuquetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API