Legal Opinion
In re McCormick & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2017No. MDL Docket No. 2665; Misc. No. 15-1825 (ESH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*219MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Consumer plaintiffs claim that defendant McCormick & Co. conspired with its retailers, including defendant Wal-Mart, to reduce the amount of black pepper in containers, deceive consumers about the reduction, and inflate the prices that consumers paid. In a prior opinion, this Court dismissed plaintiffs’ antitrust claim with prejudice but did not dismiss their consumer protection or unjust enrichment claims. See In re: McCormick & Co., Inc., Pepper Prods. Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 217 F.Supp.3d 124 (D.D.C. 2016).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Gravity Inc v. Microsoft CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re McCormick & Co., Inc., Pepper Prods. Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Durbal v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- In Re: McCormick & Company, Inc., Pepper Products Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018