Legal Opinion

Boston Consolidated Gas Co. v. Oakes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is a petition to register title to land. From the facts stated in the decision it appears that the parcel sought to be registered is bounded easterly by Washington Street, northerly by Williams Street, westerly by railroad land and southerly by McBride Street, but not including in the description three parcels of land shown on the plan. The respondent’s land is one of these three parcels and bounds on Williams Street and also on a way designated on the plan filed with the petition as Water Street, which runs from Williams Street on the north to McBride Street on the south. The petitioner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Childs v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Bailey v. Agawam National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Davis v. SikesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Mahon v. TullyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. DeVriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Tristram's Group, Inc. v. MorrowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Bonham v. MendenhallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API