Legal Opinion
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Michigan
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 23, 1992No. 2:91-CV-28PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
On August 17, 1992 this Court entered a judgment dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against the commercial fishermen defendants for failure to join indispensable parties, the Bad River and Red Cliff Tribes. Plaintiff has filed a motion pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to alter or amend judgment.
Rule 59(e) provides a procedure for correcting manifest errors of law or fact or considering the import of newly discovered evidence. E.E.O.C. v. Argent Industries, Inc., 746 F.Supp. 705, 706 (S.D.Ohio 1989).
A motion to alter or amend judgment made pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Weyerhaeuser Corp. v. Koppers Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Argent Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
3Cited by25 opinions
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States ex rel. American Textile Manufacturers Institute Inc. v. Limited, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Helton v. ACS GROUPDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
- Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.