Baier v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance

We conclude, for the reasons which follow, that the verdict was inconsistent with respect to issues of liability but that the causal negligence of Mrs. Baier is not, as a matter of law, as great as that of Mr. Laatsch, and,' therefore, that the order granting a new trial and denying a dismissal of the complaint was correct. We also express our conclusions upon several other points argued by the parties because the same points may well arise upon the second trial.

Right of way.. It appears that both drivers maintained constant speeds for some distance before the collision. At any time shortly…