Legal Opinion
Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 15, 1991No. 90-5129PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Earl Jason Lariscey appeals the summary judgment of the United States Claims Court, 1 denying his claim for compensation for an invention made while he was an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution in Bastrop, Texas. Mr. Lariscey states that he invented a jig and cutting device and process to cut Kevlar, a high-strength material used in the manufacture of helmets by the Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR), a government corporation. Mr. Lariscey states that UNICOR took his invention without just compensation, in contravention of the Fifth Amendment of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Rogers v. Desa International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993