Legal Opinion
Gorso v. Bell Equipment Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 18, 1971No. Civ. A. Nos. 68-1356, 69-20, 69-21, 69-23, 70-1177PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
KNOX, District Judge.
In this civil action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained on October 6, 1968, while working at a construction project near Huff, Pennsylvania. It is alleged that the injuries were caused by a defective crane, which crane was manufactured in France by Societe de Construtiones Mecaniques du Bugey (Societe) and sold F. O. B. France by Tichauer et cie (Tichauer) to Bell Equipment Corporation (Bell), which in turn sold the crane to The Marley Company (Marley).
The complaints filed at the above numbers have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Benn v. Linden Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Scafati v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AGDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Gorso v. Bell Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Smiley v. Gemini Investment CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Knapp v. FRANKLIN COACH COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Saccamani v. Robert Reiser & Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.