Legal Opinion

Gorso v. Bell Equipment Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 2, 1973No. Nos. 71-2035 to 71-2039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Chief Judge.

This appeal arises out of the denial by the district court, 330 F.Supp. 834, of a motion to dismiss two impleaded defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court certified the question for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and this court accepted the appeal. Pennsylvania law applies since federal jurisdiction here is predicated upon diversity of citizenship.

Appellants are two French companies, Societe de Construction du Bugey and Tichauer et Cie. The former manufactures a tower crane used in the construction industry;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Benn v. Linden Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Columbia Metal Culvert Co. v. Kaiser Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Rosen v. SolomonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. H. Alpers & Associates v. Omega Precision Hand Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API