Gorso v. Bell Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises out of the denial by the district court, 330 F.Supp. 834, of a motion to dismiss two impleaded defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court certified the question for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and this court accepted the appeal. Pennsylvania law applies since federal jurisdiction here is predicated upon diversity of citizenship.
Appellants are two French companies, Societe de Construction du Bugey and Tichauer et Cie. The former manufactures a tower crane used in the construction industry;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Benn v. Linden Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Columbia Metal Culvert Co. v. Kaiser Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Rosen v. SolomonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- H. Alpers & Associates v. Omega Precision Hand Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.