Legal Opinion

People v. LaRocco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 10, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), imposed September 17, 1997, on the ground that it is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The People do not contest the defendant’s claim that his waiver of the right to appeal was ineffective (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). We have considered the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaRocco v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API