Legal Opinion

United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1933No. 316, 317, and 318PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

289 U.S. 178 (1933)

UNITED STATES

v.

DUBILIER CONDENSER CORP.

Nos. 316, 317, and 318.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 13, 16, 1933.

Decided April 10, 1933.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

Solicitor General Thacher, with whom Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Alexander Holtzoff, Paul D. Miller, and H. Brian Holland were on the brief, for the United States.

Mr. James H. Hughes, Jr., with whom Messrs. E. Ennalls Berl and John B. Brady, were on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · RobertsJustice Roberts

Three suits were brought in the District Court for Delaware against the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Stone; Dissent · Hughes.

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ray Baillie Trash Hauling, Inc. v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Peterson v. Union Pacific R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kaplan v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Kaplan v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API