Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Hall
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing
SIMPSON, Justice.
On application for rehearing appellee insists that we were in error in our conclu*671sion that appellant’s agent Cooper occupied no such position of authority with the appellant as to constitute him its alter ego and to render his purported statement as to the terms of a policy contract binding upon his principal. Appellee calls our attention to phases of the evidence tending to show that Mr. Cooper did have such authority. With this contention we cannot agree. We took careful account of all the evidence on original consideration, and have re-examined it in the light…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Protective Life Ins. Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Simpson Sales Co. v. British General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Clark v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949