Legal Opinion

Bugg-Barber v. Randstad US, L.P.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 20, 2003No. CIV.A.01-2470 RMCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLYER, District Judge.

Juanita A. Bugg-Barber has sued her former employer, Randstad US, L.P. (“Randstad”), alleging that her discharge on January 2, 2001, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), and the Human Rights Act of the District of Columbia, D.C. CODE § 2-1402.11 (“DCHRA”). At the close of discovery, Randstad filed a motion for summary judgment, which is opposed by Ms. Bugg-Barber. After careful review of the parties’ submissions, deposition testimony, and supporting evidence, the Court concludes that Randstad is entitled to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Singh v. George Washington University School of Medicine & Health SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Nichols v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Steere v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API