Legal Opinion

Soursby v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1987No. 84-382-NJ-2; CA A38256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

In our previous opinion, we stated (85 Or App at 471):

“Moreover, the exception for zoning ordinances that appeared in the earnest money receipt does not, as a matter of law, preclude plaintiffs’ reliance on defendants’ representation. That exception did not appear in the deed.4 In Winn v. Taylor, 98 Or 556, 578, 190 P 342, 194 P 857 (1921), the court held that a prior understanding between the parties that a lease was excepted from the covenant against encumbrances was superseded by the warranty deed which did not contain the exception and that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wilkinson v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hall v. Risley and HeikkilaOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Farnsworth v. FellerOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hoover v. HegewaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Soursby v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API