Legal Opinion
Trent v. Parkview Metals Products
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 16, 1994No. 93 C 1761PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
On June 28, 1993, defendant Parkview Metal Products, Inc. served plaintiff George Trent with its Offer of Judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The Offer read, in relevant part:
Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant, Parkview Metal Products (“Parkview”), hereby offers to allow judgment to be taken against it and in favor of George Trent, the above-named plaintiff, in this action, in the amount of ONE THOUSAND ($1,000) DOLLARS, together with costs accrued to date.
Trent accepted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Alfred W. Chesny, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Steven Chesny, Deceased v. J. MarekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997