Legal Opinion

People v. Steig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1930No. Gen. No. 8,221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

The defendant, Rudolph Steig, was found guilty of violating the Illinois Prohibition Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 43, ¶ 1 et seq. The information in the case contained three counts: The first charged an unlawful sale; the second charged unlawful possession; and the third charged unlawful transportation. By the verdict of the jury, he was found guilty “in manner and form as charged in the information.” The court sentenced ' him to pay a fine of $300 and all "costs of suit under the first count, $500 under the second count, and $500 under the third count. It was further adjudged that the defendant be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Love v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  4. City of Evanston v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. PetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GulleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. People v. GulleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API