Legal Opinion
Ocuto Blacktop and Paving Co., Inc. v. Perry
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 15, 1996No. 5:95-cv-01247PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
POOLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, contractors in the area of Grif-fiss Air Force Base (“Griffiss”), allege that the defendant, Secretary of Defense William Perry, violated the statutory and regulatory requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year of 1994 (the “Act”) by failing to implement a contracting preference for local contractors when decommissioning Griffiss. See Pub.L. No. 103-160, § 2912; 48 C.F.R. pt. 226, subpt. 71. In their complaint, plaintiffs seek injunctive relief including an order directing defendant to develop a local…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yue Yu v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- Nigmadzhanov v. MuellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Sherman v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Aydemir v. GarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Echegoyen Cohen v. RenaudDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.