Legal Opinion

Durfee ex rel. Lantz v. Abbott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Debt. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This suit is brought upon a residuary legatee’s bond to recover a legacy given by the last will and testament of John T. McKeown, deceased, to Kate Lantz.

The case was before this Court at the April term, 1883, and is reported in 50 Mich. 479. Sophia Lantz, who was •one of the legatees for whose use the suit was then prose■cuted, has since dropped out of the case as a party interested. Under the facts, as they appeared in the record before the ■Court, she had no right to recover.

It appeared, as it now appears, that on October 20, 1877, ■the executor gave to these legatees his individual notes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durfee ex rel. Lantz v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. VinnMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hunt v. Supreme CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Fontana v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Corbett v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API