Legal Opinion

In re Frozen Potato Products Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 17, 2026No. 1:24-cv-11801Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE FROZEN POTATO PRODUCTS ) ANTITRUST LITIGATION ) ) No. 24-cv-11801 ) ) Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Three putative plaintiff classes (the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, the Commercial Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, and the Consumer Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs) bring suit alleging antitrust violations in connection with frozen french fries, hash browns, tater tots, and other potato products (“Frozen Potato Products”). (Dckt. ##182–84). Plaintiffs allege that four…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API