Legal Opinion

Town of Wirt v. Board of Supr's

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Controversies between the town of Wirt, the town of Belfast, and the town of Friendship, respectively, as plaintiffs, and the board of supervisors of Allegany county, as defendant, submitted without action on an agreed statement of facts, under Code Civ. Proc. § 1279. Judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

The towns of Wirt, Belfast, and Friendship, in the county of Allegany, in December, 1894, respectively presented to the board of supervisors of Allegany county a verified petition, through the supervisors of their respective towns, setting forth that in several years mentioned the expense for the construction, care, maintenance, and repair of its bridges had exceeded one-sixth of 1 per centum on the assessed valuation of the taxable property of the town for that year, and claiming that the county should pay not less than one-third part of such excess. These claims were made under section 130…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Matter of Estate of PrimeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Mongeon v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. People v. . WilmerdingNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The PocahontasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Caster v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Thacher v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Stone v. Board of Sup'rAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Thatcher v. Board of Sup'rsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API