Legal Opinion

Willner v. Frey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2007No. 06-1432UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, Marguerite and Michael Willner, brought this action in federal court after losing a portion of their real property in adverse possession litigation in state court. The district court dismissed the Willners’ complaint, holding that it did not have jurisdiction as a result of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We affirm.

I

In 1989 the Willners acquired title to approximately eleven acres along the Potomac River in Fairfax County, Virginia. In 2002 the Willners’ neighbor, Eugene Leggett, brought an ejectment action pursuant to Va.Code § 8.01-236 in the Fairfax County Circuit Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Accohannock Indian Tribe v. TylerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  2. Bixby v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  3. Carroll v. RossDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2024
  4. Dillon-Capps v. Ohana Growth Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Ihenachor v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API