Legal Opinion

People v. Rossi

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1918No. Crim. No. 443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was charged by an information with and convicted by a jury in the superior court of Placer County of having committed lewd and lascivious acts upon and with the body of a female child under the age of fourteen years, and prosecutes these appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The information is based on section 288 of the Penal Code, which reads: “Any person who shall willfully and lewdly commit any lewd or lascivious act other than the acts constituting other crimes provided for in part two of this code upon or with the body, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. SoederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. People v. MendosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. DownerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API