Sutherland v. New York & Baltimore Transportation Lines
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for summary judgment in their favor upon each of the two claims set forth in their complaint. By cross-motion, defendant seeks similar relief as respects the first claim and stands mute as to the second.
In the first cause of action, plaintiffs allege that, on January 23, 1936, defendant retained them to perform legal services in its behalf, in the way of prosecuting and collecting of a claim that defendant asserted against the United States. For work thus to be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Van LeuvenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1894
- Nesbit v. Frederick Snare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greenberg v. American Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of AnningerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Transamerica Life Insurance Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024