Legal Opinion

Kreig v. Hammels

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1925No. Civil No. 2379PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Vinton Hammels, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed his complaint against Alvina Kreig and Michael Kreig, hereinafter called defendants, setting up two causes of action, in the first claiming damages by reason of an alleged shortage in the acreage in certain land which plaintiff had leased from defendants, and, in the second, praying for judgment for $1,380, being the amount plaintiff had paid for excess electric power and which he claimed defendants were under obligation to repay to him. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendants on the first cause of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carrick v. SturtevantArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Miller Cattle Co. v. MatticeArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Coombs v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Holaway v. Realty AssociatesArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Alabam Freight Lines v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API