Legal Opinion

United States v. Angel Rodriguez, Juan Carlos Fernandez, Raphael Guelbenzo, Jesus Rodriguez, Santiago Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 1993No. 89-5831PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney Peter Golburgh defended three brothers — Angel, Lazare and Santiago Rodriguez — charged in a wide-ranging marijuana importation and distribution conspiracy. The jury acquitted Lazaro, but found Angel and Santiago guilty on some of the counts. On appeal, Angel and Santiago argue that the joint representation violated their rights to effective counsel. 1 Because the defendants fully consented to this joint representation at a pre-trial hearing, we AFFIRM.

Factual and Procedural Background

Before the start of the conspiracy trial, the district court tried to make certain that the three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Gordon R. Tatum, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Andrew PetzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. United States v. AlredCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Henry Vazquez ValoisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. United States v. Sebastian AhmedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API