Legal Opinion

Russell v. American Guild of Variety Artists

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1972No. 5081PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KOBAYASHI, J.

Appellant, Kit Russell, brought suit in circuit court against appellees, American Guild of Variety Artists (A.G.V.A.) and A.G.V.A.’s Honolulu agent, Fred O’Brien, for damages resulting from a defamatory letter written and published by O’Brien while acting as an agent of A.G.V.A. This appeal comes from the trial court’s entry of judgment for appellees.

Because the trial court’s explicit findings of fact are particularly significant for purposes of this appeal, they are here included in toto.

“1. Defendant O’Brien was the Honolulu branch manager of Defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Brauer v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Shore v. Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Awakuni v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
  4. Lauer v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kainz v. LussierHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API