Legal Opinion
Bohrer v. DeHart
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 1998No. 97CA1042PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge HUME.
Rhinosoft, LLC, as garnishee, appeals the judgment of the trial court finding it in default under a writ of continuing garnishment filed by plaintiff, Christa Bohrer. We affirm.
Bohrer obtained a judgment in a civil suit against defendant, Daniel DeHart. See Bohrer v. DeHart, 961 P.2d 472 (Colo.1998). Ongoing disputes have arisen regarding the collection of that judgment, resulting in numerous court proceedings regarding payments to be made under various writs of continuing garnishment filed by Bohrer.
DeHart is employed by garnishee, which he owns and operates with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- M.D.C./Wood, Inc. v. MortimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Bohrer v. DeHartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- C.P. & Son, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kennedy v. King Soopers Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re the Marriage of RobbinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2000