Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 19, 2017No. 16-898-cr (L)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

This case—the first criminal appeal related to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to reach this (or any) Court of Appeals—presents the question, among others, whether testimony given by an individual involuntarily under the legal compulsion of a foreign power may be used against that individual in a criminal case in an American court. As employees in the London office of Coóperatieve Céntrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (“Rabo-bank”) in the 2000s, defendants-appellants Anthony Allen and Anthony Conti (“Defendants”) played roles in that bank’s LIBOR…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. Barclays PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Garcia-Garcia v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Mara v. RillingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API