Sather v. Sather
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County denying a motion to set aside an interlocutory decree of divorce. A. P. St. Sure, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying her motion to set aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce and disallowing her application to file an answer. The complaint for divorce was upon the ground of desertion. Personal service of the summons was had upon the defendant, and failing to answer, her default was entered. On April 14, 1921, an interlocutory judgment of divorce was granted and entered in favor of plaintiff. On June 23, 1921, about six weeks subsequent to the entry of said interlocutory judgment, defendant filed two motions, one to set aside the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Garner v. ErlangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Williamson v. Cummings Rock Drill Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Kearney v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Morton v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.