Garner v. Erlanger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County refusing to set aside a default judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside a judgment entered against the defendant by default, in the county of Tulare. The motion was made, under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon the ground of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect. The action was upon a promissory note for $450, dated “Kingsburgh, February 13, 1888,” and payable at Kingsburgh one year after date, with interest. Kingsburgh is in Fresno County, and the summons and copy of the complaint were served on defendant in the county of Tulare on the twenty-eighth *61day of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Coleman v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Dougherty v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by12 opinions
- Morton v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Jensen v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Bryant v. GibbsNevada Supreme Court · 1952
- Farmers' Merchants' Ins. Co. v. CuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ross v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.