Legal Opinion
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Cunard Line Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 1, 1989No. C-84-3674-SW, C-85-3066-SWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
On December 2, 1988, an arbitral panel awarded Todd $11.5 million. Cunard disputes all parts of the award except for Part A and moves to vacate the award pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 10(d). Todd moves to confirm the entire award.
Upon oral argument, this court confirmed all parts of the award but took the matter of attorneys’ fees, Part C, under submission. Having considered the papers filed herein and the oral argument of counsel, this court makes the following…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Cunard Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In re the Arbitration between McMahan & Co. & Dunn NewFund I, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Todd Shipyards Corporation v. Cunard Line, Ltd., and M v. Sagafjord, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Cunard Line, Ltd., and M v. Sagafjord, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. v. Todd Shipyards CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991