Legal Opinion

Creary v. Davie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this contract action, plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to summary judgment because defendant’s only opposition to their motion was based on the unpleaded defense that decedent had released him from the debt arising from the contract. Defendant’s assertion of this

*1034unpleaded defense neither surprised nor prejudiced plaintiffs, and therefore it was properly considered by Supreme Court (see, Olean Urban Renewal Agency v Herman, 101 AD2d 712, 713). Because factual questions exist whether this purported release or covenant not to sue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olean Urban Renewal Agency v. HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Farnham v. FarnhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Starr v. JohnsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. TLC Medical Transportation Services Inc. v. Syracuse City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GMAC Mtge., LLC v. CoombsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Nigro Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Burstein v. SullivanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API