Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1979No. 40444PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Rule 27.26 motion. Movant seeks to vacate a jury conviction of rape and resulting four-year sentence. He appeals from a denial of his motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

He complains: He was denied effective assistance of counsel. His lawyer failed to conduct an independent factual investigation to corroborate his defense of lack of identification. He was prejudiced because he was denied witnesses who knew that he had a tattoo on his arm prior to the rape for which he was convicted. And the State had the burden to prove absence of prejudice. We disagree.

Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bennett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Grant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Careaga v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Harkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API