Legal Opinion

Harkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1983No. 44376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the circuit court erred in denying movant’s 27.26 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Richard Glen Harkins, movant-appellant, was convicted of murder in the second degree and upon conviction was sentenced to life imprisonment. This conviction was directly appealed and affirmed. State v. Harkins, 535 S.W.2d 462 (Mo.App.1976). Thereafter, movant filed a 27.26 motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Counsel was appointed and the motion amended. An evidentiary hearing on the motion was held. Subsequent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Joiner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. HarkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Gardner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Holland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Burton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API