Legal Opinion
In re McAllister-Mohler Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 12, 1930No. 6924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of Referee on Claim of Hi-Lynn Company.
The Facts.
The controlling facts briefly stated are as follows:
The claimant, the Hi-Lynn Company, and the bankrupt are both Ohio corporations *92•with their principal places of business in the city of Columbus.. On February 7, 1920, Francis R. Hunting-ton and B. Grwynn Huntington, as lessors, entered into a certain lease with the bankrupt wherein there was demised to- the bankrupt for a term of fifteen years the property on High street in the city of Columbus heretofore occupied by the bankrupt. The term of the lease was from April 1, 1922, to March…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Kothe v. R. C. Taylor TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- In re Roth & AppelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re McAllister-Mohler Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1930