Legal Opinion

Mozier v. Parsons

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 4, 1995No. 71,816PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOLMES, C.J.:

This case is before the court on a question certified by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, K.S.A. 60-3201 et seq.

United States District Judge G. T. Van Bebber has certified to this court the following question:

“In a negligence action involving injury to a child, can the attractive nuisance doctrine be used to establish liability when the injury occurred in a residential swimming pool?”

The relevant facts of this case have been outlined in the certifying…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jones v. HansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gardin v. Emporia Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  2. Walters v. St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  3. State of Arizona v. Donald Wayne DaltonArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Legleiter v. GottschalkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. Mozier v. ParsonsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API