Legal Opinion

Cox v. High Point, Randleman & Southern R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ActioN tried before Webb, J., and a jury, June Term, 1908, of Guilford.

1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.

Action for damages for wrongful death. In response to the issue as to damages, the jury responded “five thousand.” The Court entered judgment for “five thousand dollars.” This was not error.

Damages are necessarily found in money values. The only words that could be entered after “five thousand” were either “dollars” or “cents,” and no one ever says “five thousand cents.” The U. S. Compiled Statutes, sec. 3563, provides that the “dollar,” not “cent,” shall be the unit of value.

Besides, the verdict, like the charge, must be construed with reference to the trial. The complaint was for thirty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Parks v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. State v. Godwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . BlackburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. State Ex. Rel. Petty v. RousseauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Jackson Ex Rel. Porter v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Perry v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. . MillicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. State v. MillicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API