Legal Opinion

Baton v. Ledger SAS

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 6, 2025No. 3:21-cv-02470Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDWARD BATON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-02470-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 10 LEDGER SAS, et al., 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 153, 154 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs are customers who purchased a Ledger SAS hardware wallet to protect their 15 cryptocurrency assets. Ledger’s hardware wallets store customer’s “private keys” for their crypto- 16 assets. TAC ¶ 2. The private keys are similar to a bank-account password in that the private key 17 can be…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API