Legal Opinion

Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. New England Cable Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

That the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury from the dangers involved in oiling the going machine, if inferrible from its obvious character, the plaintiff’s opportunity to observe and other evidence in the case, is immaterial under the’ statute. Laws 1911, c. 163, s. 2. That the plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of the work from which his assumption of the risk could be inferred does not therefore, as the law now is, bar a recovery. Admitting as they necessarily must that the case here is to be considered upon the basis that they instructed the plaintiff to oil the machine while in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gahagan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Kambour v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  3. Whitman v. MoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hussey v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Hill v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  3. Zogoplos v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Lacasse Ex Rel. Lacasse v. AtwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  5. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API