Legal Opinion

DeSteiger v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. — Hon. Geo. W. Dunn, J udge.

1Opinion of the CourtHoush, J.

This was an action to recover damages for the destruction of a large quantity of hay by fire, which, it was alleged, escaped from one of the defendant’s locomotives, through the negligence of the servants of the ■defendant in charge thereof. Among other instructions given by the court, was the following: “If the jury find for the plaintiff, they will assess his damage at the value of the hay at the time it was destroyed, with interest thereon at six per cent from that time to the present.” Interest is not allowable in cases of this character. Kenney v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co., 63 Mo.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Atlantic & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Kenney v. Hann. & St. Jo. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ford v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Gerst v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. Brink v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Lober v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API