Legal Opinion
Heffner v. Young
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 3, 2007No. Nos. 05-15101, 05-15102PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM*
*587Chandi Duke Heffner appeals the district court’s decision to dismiss in part and stay in part her suit against the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (“DLNR”) and certain DLNR officials. Heffner argues that the DLNR defendants committed due process, double jeopardy, racketeering, and Takings Clause violations when they demanded that she allow a public right of way across her property as a condition for receiving a permit. The DLNR defendants cross-appeal, asserting that the district court should have dismissed rather than stayed Heffner’s takings claim. We affirm the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Eva Kollsman, City National Bank, Tashi Land Corporation, a New York Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- VH PROPERTY CORP. v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009